The stand taken by using the Chairman of the Bar Council of India, Manan Kumar Mishra, has once again come under sharp criticism from a body of law students. Criticizing the click launch issued by the Chairman towards ex-judges Justice Lokur and Chelameswar, who had disapproved the manner observed in the in-house inquiry, even as clearing the CJI’s call on the sexual harassment allegations, the Maharashtra Students Law Association (MASLA) has written to him. “We are also very disturbed by the insensitive remarks inside the Press Release directed towards Retired Supreme Court Justices Mr. Chelameshwar and Mr.Lokur,” said the letter.
“Why are those honorable guys being centered? Is it absolutely because they chose to speak their minds? Is it due to the fact they may not be now toeing the respectable line that the BCI appears to have desired about you at the helm?” they asked. In an editorial titled “A One-Sided Justice” posted by Live Law, Justice Lokur had commented that the Court became driven using an “institutional bias” at the same time as disregarding the allegations raised by way of the lady. Justice Chelameswar had opined that the Supreme Court did not observe due process even as hearing the sexual harassment fees against to Chief Justice of India. The BCI Chairman had expressed his ‘surprise and marvel’ about the remarks made by way of Justice Madan B. Lokur and Justice J. Chelameswar and entreated them to “keep decorum.”
Slamming this stand, MASLA has written:
“The tone of the Press Release is disparaging, to say the least. It effortlessly upends the perspectives of the 2 ex-judges to serve a duplicitous and perverse narrative of institutional harm. The institution has already been broken, however, not because the brave have spoken up, however as a substitute because the meek have not. The human beings who have expressed their reservations and dissatisfaction approximately how this issue got here to be dealt with are some distance from disgruntled people. They are reasoned people who have made their factors legally and morally”.
The letter went on to add :
“The Press Release has pushed aside the prerogative of the lady complainant and her plea that justice has not been served. The press release does not additionally explain the CJI Mr. Gogoi’s modified stance for the reason that Press meeting of the judges in 2018, wherein he changed into a willing player with the 2 ex-judges”, said the letter penned by Deepa Punjani, Executive Committee Member of the MASLA.
The MASLA asked the BCI Chairman to no longer polarize this difficulty and offer an apology to the two ex-judges for the “terribly misconceived” Press Release. They have also invited the Chairman’s interest in the troubles affecting the prison schooling region. Finally, the MASLA rued that the BCI had not paid any attention to the earlier representations dispatched to highlight the troubles confronted with the aid of law students in Maharashtra, particularly in light of the amendments brought by Mumbai University.
Earlier, the MASLA had written a letter slamming the jibes made by using the BCI Chairman against the complainant who had raised the allegations in opposition to the CJI. “You select to protect this male-centric edifice by not thinking about it when questions need to be requested, however uncomfortable these can be,” stated the sooner letter. It is a popular fact that human civilization continually needs a ruler. Without a ruler, no civilization can exist. Even the finest civilization breaks down, while the ruler turns into a vulnerable person.
Each feasible being inside the beyond dominated the humans. They have been ruled by kings, queens, dictators, Bishops, Priests, Prophets, dacoits, thugs, communists, or elected representatives. Yet all of the rulers have been people whom we should recognize and perceive. The modern global is dominated with the aid of Laws in preference to humans. Most civilized countries take pride in claiming that they have got the rule of regulation in place of the rule of thumb of any character. Laws have come to be so ideally suited that even the actual rulers, like Presidents and Prime Ministers, are purported to be subordinate to them. Thomas Fuller, an English churchman and historian, rightly expressed the ethos of the rule of regulation in the following phrases.
“Be you ever so excessive; the regulation is above you”. Law is considered impersonal as it can be written in phrases and codified within the law books. It offers a sense to the citizen that everyone is the same earlier than the law, be it the President/ Prime Minister of a country or a regular individual. Good human beings respect laws as they consider that the laws are made to benefit society, while criminals destroy the legal guidelines to make a fortune for themselves.
Yet each person suffers within the arms of law, which cannot be visible or heard. Laws have emerged as a jail; this is suffocating the modern man. There is rarely any act of pleasure or happiness that isn’t prohibited by the aid of one law or another. Hence, the law-abiders lose happiness as they have nothing to revel in by following the regulations, at the same time, while the lawbreakers lose happiness because they constantly worry that the long arm of legal guidelines can capture them and punish them. It is a fantastic lack of understanding of people to treat legal guidelines like an inanimate object lacking human characteristics. In truth, laws are like any other person or woman, and your relationships with regulations could depend on your understanding of the regulations. So let us discuss the human attributes of legal guidelines.
